|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives|
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jeff Morriss <email@example.com> wrote:
> Should we discuss the concept of removing all check_col()'s again? In
> looking at the PPP dissector, for example, it seems there may be a fair
> amount of work saved by keeping them.
My intention behind putting this check in all col_* functions was that
you do not _need_ to use check_col(), but may use it if something
needs to be calculated before put in a column. So a case-by-case
basis sounds right to me.
-- Stig Bjørlykke ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe