|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives|
Go sit in the penalty box for 20 CPU cycles.
On 10/20/2010 07:57 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> Yeah but I feel stupid because I actually found and fixed that bug in my local ipfix.c afterwards, and didn't go fix it in the bug-database entry. :(
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
>> Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>>> Ugh - my patch submitted as bug 5242 caused it. Sorry bout that.
>>> I didn't realize the bug was taken in yet (I had added myself to
>>> its cc list, but never got an email).
>> Not a problem:
>> It turns out that the addition of ipfix.c to wiretap exposed a bug in
>> another wiretap reader (ascendtext.c)
>> as well as the bug in ipfix.c that Jeff identified.
>> (ascendtext.c wasn't properly initializing *err before using it thus
>> depending on whatever value *err had from previously invoked wiretap
>> I'll be committing fixes shortly.
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <email@example.com>