|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives|
On 19 okt. 2010, at 08:53, Guy Harris <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>> Guy is right, the GPL voids this approach. Any Wireshark API call from your dissector makes it applicable, and I can't envision a plugin without one.
>> You do have proto_mark_private() which limits exposure of your plugin, by blocking Wiki access for your protocol fields.
> ...not that, if your protocol is private, you should have any documentation of it in the (public!) Wireshark Wiki anyway, so that's more of a UI politeness feature than a protection feature (after all, somebody could just build a version of Wireshark with proto_mark_private() stubbed out).
Of course it's not a prevention on distribution of the code itself, but plugs a possible information leak when a careless user likes to create wiki entries.
Any layer of information protection may be beneficial to help convince "the management" to support Wireshark use and development.
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>