Re: [Wireshark-dev] Has anybody successfully built a static version of Wireshark or TShark *with* plugin support?

On Oct 11, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Guy Harris wrote:

> Is there *any* platform on which you can build a 100% statically-linked Wireshark or TShark *and* have support for plugins? If not, there's probably not much point in leaving in any support for it.

...where by "it" in "leaving in any support for it" I'm not referring to a statically-linked Wireshark or TShark, I'm referring to one that is statically-linked *and* supports loading plugins.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Gerald Combs: "Re: [Wireshark-dev] FW: [Wireshark-commits] rev 34468: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: main.c"
• Previous message: Jaap Keuter: "[Wireshark-dev] FW: [Wireshark-commits] rev 34468: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: main.c"
• In reply to: Guy Harris: "[Wireshark-dev] Has anybody successfully built a static version of Wireshark or TShark *with* plugin support?"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]