|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives|
On 08/19/2010 02:15 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Jaap Keuter wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:14:43 +0200, Anders Broman
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
>>>> Sent: den 18 augusti 2010 11:02
>>>> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>>>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove old packet list code in trunk?
>>>> Mind you that it would make back porting to trunk-1.4 of packet list related code more difficult since the
>>>> source code will diverge.
>>>> That means more manual back porting, which is more laborious and error prone (sorry Gerald).
>>>> I would suggest holding off on stripping trunk of old packet list code, but not to maintain it. After we put>1.4.1 'in the wild' and survives real user scrutiny it time to start ripping it out IMHO.
>>> I agree with you, just to be clear not having NEW_PACKET_LIST defined
>>> is not expected to
>>> Work in trunk any more. Perhapps adding comments about that and/or
>>> change it to #if 0 if edditing a file for
>>> Other reasons?
>> The only thing to be done in trunk is to remove the configuration
>> option or add a 'no longer functional' remark to the item
>> Changing to #if 0 would also invalidate patches for back porting.
> Would moving to Git or Mercurial help for this?
I don't see how another revision control system helps with porting incompatible
patches between branches.
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>