| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives |
Re: [Wireshark-dev] .so and .la files
From: Brian Oleksa <oleksab_at_nospam>Date: Tue Oct 05 2010 - 18:14:01 GMT
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Eloy
No problem.
I removed the .la file and the dissector still seams to work just fine.
I am going to deploy it without the .la file.
Unless somebody else says differently.
Thanks,
Brian
On 10/5/2010 2:04 PM, Eloy Paris wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 01:57 PM, Eloy Paris wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Current Wireshark 1.4.x packages in the Debian experimental distribution
>> do not ship the .la files, and I verified that I can build Network
>> Expect, an external application that uses libwireshark services, just
>> fine against the respective -dev packages.
>>
>> So long story short, yes, the .so is the only thing someone would need,
>> but if you find otherwise I'd love to hear about it.
> Whoops, sorry for replying to myself but I just realized that you're
> talking about a plugin, which is something that perhaps is "loaded via
> libltdl in a way that requires that meta-information [in the .la file]".
> In that case the .la is needed. I guess the best thing to do would be to
> test if things work without the .la file...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eloy Paris.-
> netexpect.org
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe