spamassassin-users January 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: List Policy Question: Why no reply-to: h

Re: List Policy Question: Why no reply-to: header?

From: Benny Pedersen <me_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Jan 31 2011 - 18:22:34 GMT
To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:28:27 -0500, Adam Moffett <adamlists@plexicomm.net>
wrote:

> People can believe I'm dumb for thinking that adding/modifying the
> reply-to: header is a simpler and cleaner solution, and I can believe
> people are dumb for thinking there should be multiple reply buttons in
> MUA's. I suppose we'll just have to each agree that the other party is
> dumb.

no Reply-To: should be ignored if List-Post: header exists, make a local
procmailrc that changes it for you or use a mua that solves it eq install
roundcube 0.5 stable, and commit patches if it works badly compared to
thunderbird :)