spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: URIBL_DBL_REDIR

Re: URIBL_DBL_REDIR

From: Daniel McDonald <dan.mcdonald_at_nospam>
Date: Wed Dec 28 2011 - 17:11:15 GMT
To: spamassassin <users@spamassassin.apache.org>

I have such a meta (I've been querying URIBL_DBL for some time).

Out of 140 hits on the meta, only about 14 pushed the spam over from flagged
to quarantined this week. I checked through many of them and each sample
looked like obnoxious spam.

On 12/28/11 10:51 AM, "Ned Slider" <ned@unixmail.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi List,
>
> I noticed the recent addition of URIBL_DBL_REDIR hitting on a few spams:
>
> 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIR dbl.spamhaus.org. A
> 127.0.1.3
> 25_uribl.cf:body URIBL_DBL_REDIR
> eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIRECTOR')
> 25_uribl.cf:describe URIBL_DBL_REDIR Contains a URL listed in
> the DBL as a spammed redirector domain
>
> Nice.
>
> I just wondered if someone would like to look at a meta rule with
> FREEMAIL_FROM as that's hitting a lot of spam here, although I don't see
> too much (non-ML) legit freemail so I don't know how much ham it might
> hit for others (hence the request).
>
>