spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: whitelist rules should include IP addres

Re: whitelist rules should include IP address in output?

From: Greg Troxel <gdt_at_nospam>
Date: Sat Dec 24 2011 - 15:42:08 GMT
To: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.org>

Benny Pedersen <me@junc.org> writes:

> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:54:59 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=1.0
>> tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_FORGED,
>> Content analysis details: (-5.7 points, 1.0 required)
>
> hmm why diff scores now ?

because BAYES_50 on arrival changed to BAYES_00 on the rerun because of
a batch sa-learn on INBOX early in the morning. Like I said, arguably
wrong, but my issue and separate to the

> dkim forged can be solved with adsp no ?

I think this isn't really forged mail, so I'm not sure what you mean.
If the default rules mis-label dkim, then it seems they should be fixed,
but I have the impression that there is too much header munging going on
in the world for dkim to really work right.

> why not report it to dnswl ?

I will try, but I have not had much luck from reporting things to them.