spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?

From: John Hardin <jhardin_at_nospam>
Date: Fri Dec 23 2011 - 15:49:31 GMT

On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, wrote:

> On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
>> The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
>> To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
>> an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
> Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that
> it doesn't allow you to access the same bayes db from multiple machines
> at the same time. Unless I'm mistaken..?

Each machine would have its own copy of the latest database.

Learning would be to a master that is not being read, and that master
would be periodically distributed to SA hosts.

-- John Hardin KA7OHZ FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/, "it never does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here." -- Peter da Silva in a.s.r ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 days until Christmas