| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives |
Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?
From: John Hardin <jhardin_at_nospam>Date: Fri Dec 23 2011 - 15:49:31 GMT
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, spamassassin@lists.grepular.com wrote:
> On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
>> The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
>> To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
>> an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
>
> Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that
> it doesn't allow you to access the same bayes db from multiple machines
> at the same time. Unless I'm mistaken..?
Each machine would have its own copy of the latest database.
Learning would be to a master that is not being read, and that master
would be periodically distributed to SA hosts.
-- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here." -- Peter da Silva in a.s.r ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 days until Christmas