spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules

Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Dec 19 2011 - 10:20:28 GMT

>On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 13:57 -0500, wrote:
>> Basically, without evidence money is not charged to be delisted from any
>> of those three lists, they're going to stay out of the default rule set.

On 17.12.11 12:16, Noel Butler wrote:
>Lastly, I would have thought SA dev team would have liked to see hard
>evidence that someone was _forced_ to pay the 50 donation to be
>delisted, because all I here is "the web site says it" which frankly
>doesn't cut it with me, we were nobody special to SORBS, so I can't see
>why they'd remove us for free but forcibly demand payments from others,
>the only common ground we had with Matt back then was we were both
>located in the same city, along with 2 million others.

afaik, the request for donating $50 to charity (not paying SORBS! some
people did have lied about this) was removed some time ago, and
delisting is now done upon request.

-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, ; Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.