spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: DNS{B,W}Ls and blocking (was Re: DNSWL w

Re: DNS{B,W}Ls and blocking (was Re: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow)

From: Benny Pedersen <me_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Dec 15 2011 - 00:18:03 GMT
To: <>

On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:18:52 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Not quite. We are working on return codes that lead to the end the
> purposefully wrong answers for DNSBLs so Blocked doesn't mean
> blackholing the requests. Confusing, I know.

yes, its a hell out there in dns world, rbldnsd only support udp while
bind required udp/tcp on top of that some severs still blackhole my ipv4
address in there dns servers, if that does not get better i will simply
disable DNSEval plugin in future

sorbs still use rbldnsd as front end servers :(

who can send me a named.conf that ONLY do queryes with udp ?

might be more simple just disable DNSEval :(

and now today my asus eee 1001ha does not boot windows xp, super that i
still have another asus eee that works, eee PC 2G Surf (512M mem, 2048M
harddisk, win xp)

it host freenas very well on that hardware
> Regards,