spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of

Re: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow

From: Benny Pedersen <me_at_nospam>
Date: Tue Dec 13 2011 - 02:25:45 GMT
To: <>

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:12:56 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:

>> DNSWL is scaned in deep received, but none have reporteed this :(
> DNSWL for SA is implemented with first-trusted on all the tests in SA
> I found. I don't see any deep-header parsing.

if its was we all need to use trusted_networks even more, its
firstuntrusted, not first hop ;/

whitelists should be fitsthop only, no ?

>> #6718 should have being resolved wont-fix
> No, it was a duplicate complaint. Marking it a duplicate was
> accurate IMO.

spamassassin is not a book of howto setup dns servers or is it now ?

>> #6668 agree on comment #1, the rest is just fuss imho
> As I wrote comment 1, I have to agree it was brilliant ;-)

atleast some have humor in this month :-)