|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives|
On 12/6/2011 3:11 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:45:49 -0500
> "Kevin A. McGrail"<KMcGrail@PCCC.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm not very familiar with sa-update, but perhaps it should have
>>>> seperate channels similar to Debian's "stable" and "testing"
>>>> releases. A new DNSBL (IMO) would definitely be a "testing"
>>>> release. End-users could then subscribe to whichever channel
>>>> suited their risk profiles.
>> -1 unless someone is going to volunteer to set it up.
> Is there much to set up? sa-update already has a --channel argument.
> It seems to me all you need to do is put new DNSBLs in a testing
> channel. People who want them could include
> "--channel testing.updates.spamassassin.org" or whatever in their
> sa-update invocation.
> Am I missing something important?
The masscheck portion of preparing the rules for publishing.