spamassassin-users December 2011 archive
| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives |
Re: URIBL_PH_SURBL
From: Jeff Chan <jeffc_at_nospam>Date: Thu Dec 01 2011 - 17:36:37 GMT
To: Ned Slider <ned@unixmail.co.uk>
Also keep in mind that PH has a generally low score even for net
+ bayes since it doesn't hit a large portion of spam in the SA
corpus. (In other words phishing and malware unsolicited
messages are a relatively small subset of unsolicited messages in
general.) However the unsolicited messages it does hit are
generally going to be phishing or malware, so IMO it should have
a much higher score. Unless people want to get phishing and
malware....
Cheers,
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/