spamassassin-dev April 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-dev archives
spamassassin-dev: By Thread

spamassassin-dev By Thread

SubjectAuthor Date
Fwd: Mail::OpenDKIMJ.D. Falk28 Apr 2011
[auto] bad sandbox rules reportRules Report Cron27 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] New: IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam26 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam27 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam27 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam27 Apr 2011
--> New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlydarxus_at_nospam28 Apr 2011
--> Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyQuanah Gibson-Mount28 Apr 2011
--> Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyWarren Togami Jr.29 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyJustin Mason29 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyKevin A. McGrail29 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlydarxus_at_nospam29 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyJustin Mason29 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyWarren Togami Jr.30 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyKevin A. McGrail30 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyDaryl C. W. O'Shea30 Apr 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyTodd Rinaldo01 May 2011
--> Re: Proposed: 3.3.2-beta1 on May 4th Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlyWarren Togami Jr.01 May 2011
--> Re: New release Re: [Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlydarxus_at_nospam28 Apr 2011
[Bug 6577] IPv6 encapsulated IPv4 sender not detected correctlybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam28 Apr 2011
[Bug 6443] [review] Metadata Headers are Case-Sensitivebugzilla-daemon_at_nospam25 Apr 2011
[Bug 6443] [review] Metadata Headers are Case-Sensitivebugzilla-daemon_at_nospam25 Apr 2011
[Bug 6564] make install does NOT replace existing binariesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
ALL_TRUSTED vs. direct-to-MX checksJohn Hardin23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] New: score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam22 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam22 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam22 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam22 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6576] score for TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT and TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP too highbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam23 Apr 2011
[Bug 6556] Only mass-check emails that have been readbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam22 Apr 2011
Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?darxus_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?Benny Pedersen21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?darxus_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?darxus_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?Daryl C. W. O'Shea22 Apr 2011
--> Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?Benny Pedersen21 Apr 2011
JOBS=x in auto_mass_check.shJari Fredriksson21 Apr 2011
Re: JOBS=x in auto_mass_check.shWarren Togami Jr.21 Apr 2011
--> Re: JOBS=x in auto_mass_check.shJari Fredriksson21 Apr 2011
[Bug 6575] New: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF does test From: headerbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
[Bug 6575] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF does test From: headerbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
[Bug 6575] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF does test From: headerbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
[Bug 6575] Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF does test From: headerbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
Req: Dan, corpus check plzJohn Hardin20 Apr 2011
Re: Req: Dan, corpus check plzWarren Togami Jr.21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Req: Dan, corpus check plzHenrik Krohns21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Req: Dan, corpus check plzdarxus_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Req: Dan, corpus check plzHenrik Krohns21 Apr 2011
[Bug 6574] New: sa-update for 3.3.x gets no new rulesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam20 Apr 2011
[auto] bad sandbox rules reportRules Report Cron20 Apr 2011
Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16darxus_at_nospam18 Apr 2011
Re: Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16darxus_at_nospam18 Apr 2011
Re: Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16Warren Togami Jr.21 Apr 2011
Re: Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16darxus_at_nospam21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16Yet Another Ninja21 Apr 2011
--> Re: Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16darxus_at_nospam22 Apr 2011
--> Re: Missing mass-check submissions for 2011-04-16Warren Togami Jr.22 Apr 2011
Volunteer for CPAN release 3.3.2Steffen Schwigon18 Apr 2011
Re: Volunteer for CPAN release 3.3.2Steffen Schwigon19 Apr 2011
--> Re: Volunteer for CPAN release 3.3.2Daryl C. W. O'Shea19 Apr 2011
--> Re: Volunteer for CPAN release 3.3.2Steffen Schwigon21 Apr 2011
A new breed of short-circuiting for rules?Adam Katz16 Apr 2011
Re: A new breed of short-circuiting for rules?John Hardin16 Apr 2011
[Bug 6573] New: Report for IPv6 IP hitting DNS BL/WL is brokenbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam15 Apr 2011
Build failed in Jenkins: SpamAssassin-trunk #6896Apache Hudson Server15 Apr 2011
Build failed in Jenkins: SpamAssassin-trunk #6897Apache Hudson Server15 Apr 2011
--> Jenkins build is back to normal : SpamAssassin-trunk #6898Apache Hudson Server15 Apr 2011
[Bug 6572] New: URI parser mishandles parenthesisbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam15 Apr 2011
[Bug 6572] URI parser mishandles parenthesisbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam15 Apr 2011
Daily builds of SpamAssassin for Ubuntudarxus_at_nospam15 Apr 2011
Applying patches from Debian?darxus_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
Re: Applying patches from Debian?Warren Togami Jr.13 Apr 2011
Re: Applying patches from Debian?Kevin A. McGrail13 Apr 2011
[auto] bad sandbox rules reportRules Report Cron13 Apr 2011
[Bug 6571] New: FH_DATE_PAST_20XX alive and well in CentOS 5.6 buildbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
[Bug 6571] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX alive and well in CentOS 5.6 buildbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
[Bug 6571] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX alive and well in CentOS 5.6 buildbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
[Bug 6571] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX alive and well in CentOS 5.6 buildbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
[Bug 6571] FH_DATE_PAST_20XX alive and well in CentOS 5.6 buildbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
Mailspike PerformanceWarren Togami Jr.12 Apr 2011
Overlapping blacklists Re: Mailspike Performancedarxus_at_nospam12 Apr 2011
--> Re: Overlapping blacklists Re: Mailspike Performancedarxus_at_nospam12 Apr 2011
--> One meta to rule them all (Overlapping blacklists)Adam Katz15 Apr 2011
Re: Mailspike PerformanceGreg Troxel13 Apr 2011
--> Re: Mailspike Performancedarxus_at_nospam13 Apr 2011
--> Re: Mailspike PerformanceGreg Troxel14 Apr 2011
--> Re: Mailspike PerformanceJohn Hardin14 Apr 2011
--> Re: Mailspike Performancedarxus_at_nospam14 Apr 2011
[Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECTbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam12 Apr 2011
[Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECTbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam12 Apr 2011
spamassassin2.zones.apache.org on http://monitoring.apache.org/status/John Hardin12 Apr 2011
Re: [SA-dev] Script to collect IP reputation data from SA mass-check targetsdarxus_at_nospam12 Apr 2011
Why do nightly and weekly masschecks use different tagged builds?darxus_at_nospam11 Apr 2011
[Bug 6519] RBL lookups for IPv6 addressesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam11 Apr 2011
[Bug 6519] RBL lookups for IPv6 addressesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam11 Apr 2011
[Bug 6519] RBL lookups for IPv6 addressesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam10 Apr 2011
[Bug 6519] RBL lookups for IPv6 addressesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam10 Apr 2011
[Bug 6266] MakeMaker: SYSCONFDIR/CONTACT_ADDRESS/BUILD_SPAMC/... is not a known MakeMaker parameter name.bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam10 Apr 2011
Re: ruleqa is brokendarxus_at_nospam10 Apr 2011
Re: ruleqa is brokenJohn Hardin10 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokendarxus_at_nospam10 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokenJohn Hardin11 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokenJohn Hardin11 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokenWarren Togami Jr.11 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokendarxus_at_nospam11 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokenJohn Hardin11 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokenKevin A. McGrail11 Apr 2011
--> Re: ruleqa is brokenJohn Hardin11 Apr 2011
[Bug 6570] New: SpamAssassin 3.3.1, installed from CPAN, reports "unparsable", "bogus" and "(unknown)" module version numbers; not upgradable via CPANbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam10 Apr 2011
Jenkins build became unstable: SpamAssassin-trunk #6868Apache Hudson Server09 Apr 2011
Jenkins build is back to stable : SpamAssassin-trunk #6869Apache Hudson Server10 Apr 2011
[Bug 6303] CLOSE_WAIT and defunct process problemsbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam08 Apr 2011
[Bug 6556] Only mass-check emails that have been readbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam07 Apr 2011
[Bug 6556] Only mass-check emails that have been readbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam07 Apr 2011
[Bug 6556] Only mass-check emails that have been readbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam07 Apr 2011
[Bug 6556] Only mass-check emails that have been readbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam07 Apr 2011
How do you maintain your mass-check target folders?darxus_at_nospam07 Apr 2011
Re: How do you maintain your mass-check target folders?Warren Togami Jr.07 Apr 2011
--> Re: How do you maintain your mass-check target folders?darxus_at_nospam07 Apr 2011
--> Re: How do you maintain your mass-check target folders?Warren Togami Jr.07 Apr 2011
Re: How do you maintain your mass-check target folders?John Hardin08 Apr 2011
Re: How do you maintain your mass-check target folders?Jari Fredriksson08 Apr 2011
[Bug 6552] [review for 3.2] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP ruleset incorrectly black flagging IP range!!!bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam06 Apr 2011
[Bug 6552] [review for 3.2] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP ruleset incorrectly black flagging IP range!!!bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam06 Apr 2011
[Bug 6552] [review for 3.2] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP ruleset incorrectly black flagging IP range!!!bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam06 Apr 2011
[Bug 6552] [review for 3.2] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP ruleset incorrectly black flagging IP range!!!bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam06 Apr 2011
[auto] bad sandbox rules reportRules Report Cron06 Apr 2011
[Bug 6554] HTML messages with <p style="color:#FFFFFF;" > fool html_font_invisible()bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6554] HTML messages with <p style="color:#FFFFFF;" > fool html_font_invisible()bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6554] HTML messages with <p style="color:#FFFFFF;" > fool html_font_invisible()bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6085] Report to KnujOnbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6085] Report to KnujOnbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6558] [review] body rules having "tflags multiple" may cause infinite loop when compiledbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6085] Report to KnujOnbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6085] Report to KnujOnbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam04 Apr 2011
[Bug 6085] Report to KnujOnbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam04 Apr 2011
[Bug 6430] Would it be good to consider like an MSA a trusted relay authenticating a user?bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam04 Apr 2011
[Bug 6430] Would it be good to consider like an MSA a trusted relay authenticating a user?bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam04 Apr 2011
[Bug 6430] Would it be good to consider like an MSA a trusted relay authenticating a user?bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam04 Apr 2011
[Bug 6569] New: [PATCH r1088422 2011-04-03] spamd.1 -- Order items alphabeticallybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam03 Apr 2011
[Bug 6569] [PATCH r1088422 2011-04-03] spamd.1 -- Order items alphabeticallybugzilla-daemon_at_nospam03 Apr 2011
Conflict of interest on plugins and rule sets pagesdarxus_at_nospam03 Apr 2011
Re: Conflict of interest on plugins and rule sets pagesKevin A. McGrail05 Apr 2011
Lack of sorting in sought Re: svn commit: r1088313 - /spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jm/20_sought.cfdarxus_at_nospam03 Apr 2011
[Bug 6568] New: Evaluate Spamhaus Whitelistbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam03 Apr 2011
[Bug 6567] New: Clean up zen rbl rulesbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam03 Apr 2011
[Bug 6566] New: X-Ham-Report default wording ("has identified this incoming email as possible spam") is confusing and inaccuratebugzilla-daemon_at_nospam02 Apr 2011
[Bug 6566] X-Ham-Report default wording ("has identified this incoming email as possible spam") is confusing and inaccuratebugzilla-daemon_at_nospam02 Apr 2011
[Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECTbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam02 Apr 2011
Removed remote embedded images from plugins pagedarxus_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?darxus_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?Yet Another Ninja01 Apr 2011
Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?Yet Another Ninja01 Apr 2011
Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?Karsten Bräckelmann01 Apr 2011
--> Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?darxus_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?Warren Togami Jr.02 Apr 2011
--> Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?darxus_at_nospam02 Apr 2011
--> Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?Warren Togami Jr.05 Apr 2011
[Bug 6565] New: check_rbl_sub rules - all dots need to be escapedbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
[Bug 6565] check_rbl_sub rules - all dots need to be escapedbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
[Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECTbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
[Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECTbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam01 Apr 2011
[Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECTbugzilla-daemon_at_nospam01 Apr 2011