Re: T_ rules being published?

On 11/21, Axb wrote:
> >Doesn't look like it. T_DKIM_INVALID, T_DOS_ZIP_HARDCORE,
> >T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT, T_FORGED_TBIRD_IMG_SIZE, T_FRM_SILVER_GOLD,
> >T_FRT_ADULT2 are not used in any meta rule.
>
> no T_* rules are in last 10_force_active.cf nor in 72_scores.cf so I
> assume we're lacking an sa-update

They're in 72_active.cf. And my update version still matches the latest
version according to the relevant DNS record:

On 11/21, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> $ host -t txt 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org
> 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "1195874"
>
> $ head -n 1 ../updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> # UPDATE version 1195874
>
> This stuff is showing up in the rules currently being published for SA
> v3.3.1. Right?

-- "Of course there's strength in numbers. But there's strength in sharp weaponry too. Ironically, this lead to what we call 'civilization'." - spore http://www.ChaosReigns.com

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam: "[Bug 6683] [review] RuleQA is sorting masschecks lexically instead of numerically"
• Previous message: Axb: "Re: T_ rules being published?"
• In reply to: Axb: "Re: T_ rules being published?"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]