spamassassin-dev November 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-dev archives
spamassassin-dev: Re: T_ rules being published?

Re: T_ rules being published?

From: <darxus_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Nov 21 2011 - 17:23:53 GMT

On 11/21, Axb wrote:
> >Doesn't look like it. T_DKIM_INVALID, T_DOS_ZIP_HARDCORE,
> >T_FRT_ADULT2 are not used in any meta rule.
> no T_* rules are in last nor in so I
> assume we're lacking an sa-update

They're in And my update version still matches the latest
version according to the relevant DNS record:

On 11/21, wrote:
> $ host -t txt
> descriptive text "1195874"
> $ head -n 1 ../
> # UPDATE version 1195874
> This stuff is showing up in the rules currently being published for SA
> v3.3.1. Right?

-- "Of course there's strength in numbers. But there's strength in sharp weaponry too. Ironically, this lead to what we call 'civilization'." - spore