|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
>From my bash history:
spamassassin -tD < missing_RP_MATCHES_RCVD.txt > missing_RP_MATCHES_RCVD_output.txt 2>&1
On 12/22, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> How are you calling SA? One theory that might cause your issue is to use a
> milter that might be syntheisizing the mbox format prior to your MTA
> actually adding the real received and From delimiter.
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> People on the users list are complaining about getting lots of false
> negatives due to RP_MATCHES_RCVD. RuleQA doesn't say particularly good
> things about its rank or score:
> Neither of those things really concern me, because I know the reasons for
> score selection can be complicated.
> What does concern me is that ruleqa says 29% of my ham hits it, but *none*
> of my ham actually has a hit on that rule in my mailboxes. It's only
> showing up in masscheck, not when I get the mail, and not when I manually
> re-run spamassassin on an email that masscheck says hit it.
> The latest example that masscheck says hit this rule:
> As far as I can tell, that email should hit RP_MATCHES_RCVD. Because these
> have the same domain:
> Return-Path: <email@example.com>
> Received: from anyemails.yesup.com (mail.anyemails.com [220.127.116.11])
> I'm running trunk synced about a month ago.
> This is the output of running "spamassassin -tD" on it, so you can see it's
> loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval:
> Any idea why I'm not getting hits on this rule when I run it manually, but
> am getting lots of hits via masscheck?
> "I d!
> want people who want to dance, I want people who have to dance."
> --George Balanchine
> Visible links
> 1. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20111217/RP_MATCHES_RCVD/detail
> 2. http://www.chaosreigns.com/sa/missing_RP_MATCHES_RCVD.txt
> 3. http://anyemails.yesup.com/
> 4. http://mail.anyemails.com/
> 5. http://18.104.22.168/
> 6. http://www.chaosreigns.com/sa/missing_RP_MATCHES_RCVD_output.txt
> 7. http://www.chaosreigns.com/
-- "A ship in a port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for." -Grace Murray Hopper http://www.ChaosReigns.com