spamassassin-dev December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-dev archives
spamassassin-dev: [Bug 6721] ADVANCE_FEE_* scores are too dynami

[Bug 6721] ADVANCE_FEE_* scores are too dynamic

From: <bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam>
Date: Sat Dec 17 2011 - 02:17:43 GMT
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6721

John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org> changed:

           What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC| |jhardin@impsec.org

--- Comment #4 from John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org> 2011-12-17 02:17:43 UTC ---
I don't have a problem promoting the ADVANCE_FEE_* rules to static, but I
regularly modify the subrules as new 419s come across the wire. Is having a
static rule that depends on a subrule in a sandbox considered kosher? Or would
the subrules be moved out to static rule files as well, even given their
non-static dynamicness? :)

-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.