|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
--- Comment #4 from Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec@ijs.si> 2011-11-15 01:19:21 UTC ---
> Thanks. Good catch. That explains the behavior I'm seeing. This is
> undocumented and outside the scope of the rule type.
> OK, so going back as far as 3.2.5, the uri rule apparently purposefully also
> adds the domain from the DKIM/DomainKey Signature header.
> So should the documentation be changed or the rule uri parsing? To me, it
> seems VERY hackish that the only headers for URI rules are domainkeys/dkim.
Hackish indeed. No idea what was the rationale. I'd vote for throwing it out.
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.