[Bug 6700] URI Rule Type appears to fire on headers and it shouldn't...

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6700

--- Comment #4 from Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec@ijs.si> 2011-11-15 01:19:21 UTC ---
> Thanks. Good catch. That explains the behavior I'm seeing. This is
> undocumented and outside the scope of the rule type.
> OK, so going back as far as 3.2.5, the uri rule apparently purposefully also
> adds the domain from the DKIM/DomainKey Signature header.
> So should the documentation be changed or the rule uri parsing? To me, it
> seems VERY hackish that the only headers for URI rules are domainkeys/dkim.

Hackish indeed. No idea what was the rationale. I'd vote for throwing it out.

-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam: "[Bug 6701] masschecks seem to be blocked"
• Previous message: bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam: "[Bug 6698] New DCC.pm improves performance, is more resilient."
• In reply to: bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam: "[Bug 6700] New: URI Rule Type appears to fire on headers and it shouldn't..."
• Next in thread: bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam: "[Bug 6700] URI Rule Type appears to fire on headers and it shouldn't..."

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]