|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
--- Comment #28 from Karsten BrÃ¤ckelmann <email@example.com> 2011-12-14 20:28:13 UTC ---
> Other than taking out the nice flag which I agreed with comments above likely
> shouldn't exist, looks good to me. I am unsure if setting a score in
> 50_scores.cf AND the forcepublish is needed for 25_uribl.cf rules but I can't
> see how it hurts. I was planning to do the same thing.
Frankly, dunno either. But I figured mimicking what's done for the excellent
performing rules like URIBL_BLACK won't hurt for a rule not even supposed to
ever hit in mass-checks. After all, we *want* these rules to be published.
> svn commit -m 'Removed nice flag on _BLOCKED rules'
> > The DNSWL rules file 70_dnswl.cf probably should be moved out of the sandbox
> > eventually.
> I could make this argument for all of the sandbox rules that are published but
> that's a higher-level issue than for this ticket.
Agreed. Just mentioned it, since it's a complete rule-set file for DNSWL,
similar to 25_uribl.cf, even featuring the copyright header.
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.