|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
--- Comment #21 from Kevin A. McGrail <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2011-12-13 21:47:24 UTC ---
> Matthias, if you can decide on a bit (not a bitmask) to return for DNSWL
> blocks, we can add the notification rule.
Based on KB's notes, 255 is acceptable for DNSWL because it's not implemented
with a bitmask.
> And if this moves you to change your decision to implement the purposefully
> wrong DNS response, we can move DNSWL back to default configuration.
> Then we'll keep the ticket open and perhaps someone can work on a way to make
> spamd recognize that the BLOCK rule is triggered and hold off on subsequent
> DNSBL queries for 1 hour.
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.