|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
On 2011-11-07 15:52, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 11/7/2011 8:44 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Axb wrote:
>>> Can't figure out why they they get published with a T_* in
>>> 72_active.cf when the original rules don't have them.
>>> Would someone pls clue me in?
>> A manually-named T_ rule is for testing.
>> The T_ added by masscheck-rescore means "not performing well enough to
>> Those rules shouldn't appear in 72_active.cf
> I'm not seeing this issue on trunk with the 1195874 rules. Can you be
> more specific?
ignore - "mental hiccup"