|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
--- Comment #25 from D. Stussy <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2011-12-12 20:49:17 UTC ---
"No, because that refused code is non-standard." ??? Huh? Excuse me:
It's defined in standards-track RFC documents (2929 section 2.3, 2136 section
2.2, 1035 section 4.1.1 [24 years old], 883 page 27 [28 years old]), and
several other RFCs too. RFC 1035 is marked as an accepted standard.
If you're saying that DNS lists aren't using the code, that's their problem,
not SA's. Does SA handle the code properly when presented or not?
RFC 5782 indicates that any DNS based list should return a value in 127.0.0.0/8
(even for IPv6 lists). It is further noted that such lists, when their domains
expire, often return values outside of this range when a registrar holds the
domain open for sale. Therefore, I don't see why you think that's a problem
too.... Every valid DNS list will return values in 127/8 or none at all.
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.