|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
--- Comment #28 from Matthias Leisi <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2011-12-12 20:33:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > Overall, the efficacy of DNSWL outside of the FP scores is well established
> > and that's not a barrier to the re-enabling of the scores.
It should be noted that the policy contested in this bug does not cause FPs. It
does cause FNs for a small number of users (where other attempts to rectify an
unaccepted situation failed). On the other hand, removing the rules will lead
to a higher risk of FPs for 99.something % of users.
> Well established based on what? Has anyone looked at the statistics to prove
> that this situation has not changed?
Well established based on http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/. While the stats
have a lot of fluctuation which makes it sometimes hard to interpret individual
data points, it generally shows the "usefulness" of dnswl.org rules/data.
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.