|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
--- Comment #14 from Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec@ijs.si> 2011-06-09 22:20:12 UTC ---
> Certainly no objection to renaming. Do I need to modify the patch?
No need, it's just a cosmetic change.
> What does voting and 3.3.2 have to do with a test rule for masschecks?
Not necessary, but it can't hurt to hear a general approval.
> I normally wouldn't suggest this, but given that this is another return code
> for an existing network query, we might be better off immediately putting it
> into production alongside the other URIBL_DBL_* rules with an informational
> score, then make it "reuse" so it does not differ from the other rules and
> trigger extra DNS lookups during masscheck.
Sure. As far as I'm concerned, just commit it.
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.