| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives |
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6718
--- Comment #5 from Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail@pccc.com> 2011-12-10 01:47:12 UTC ---
Thank you for the much clearer complaint.
I agree. Returning a positive answer is wrong. RBL providers should only
return special answers that are defined as over-limit, return no answer, block
the queries or something else that does not cause FPs.
Unless they change this policy, I must recommend that DNSWL be disabled by
default immediately.
Darxus, do you remember the bug that discussed rate limit responses for an RBL?
-- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.