spamassassin-dev December 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-dev archives
spamassassin-dev: [Bug 6718] DNSWL whitelist corruption

[Bug 6718] DNSWL whitelist corruption

From: <bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam>
Date: Sat Dec 10 2011 - 01:45:09 GMT
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6718

--- Comment #4 from drmres@yahoo.com 2011-12-10 01:45:09 UTC ---
Hi,

As previously replied to you, and with the standing that you are unaware of the
nameservers being used, the fact is that whether a nameserver makes multiple
requests or not, the result should never, ever, be that a domain is trusted
when you have no proof of it being so.

Your organisation is also of no standing to determine which nameservers are
abusive as the lookups could very well be legitimate in their requests, as are
those that have been made in this instance. Even so, to return a 'trusted'
response for any and all lookups if ludicrous. This defeats the whole purpose
of your 'service'.

I have never heard of anything similar - ever.

Your comments have been forwarded to the appropriate departments.

Kind regards.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd H. Steiner (dnswl.org) via RT [mailto:admins@dnswl.org]
Sent: 10 December 2011 02:28
To: xxxx@xxxx.com
Subject: [admin.dnswl.org #25026] Your lists are corrupt

No, but if all your requests get a hi that is a strong indicator that you are
using an abusive nameservers as reported in
http://dnswl.org/news/archives/24-Abusive-use-of-dnswl.org-infrastructure-enforcing-limits.html

No, not any any nameserver *not* on your subscription list will return a 'true'
for any lookup, see also the announcement above.

regards
bernd
-- Bernd H. Steiner - senior zone editor http://www.dnswl.org DNS Whitelist - Protect against false positives -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.