snort-users May 2009 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > snort-users archives
snort-users: Re: [Snort-users] SPAN groups and network taps

Re: [Snort-users] SPAN groups and network taps

From: Jefferson, Shawn <Shawn.Jefferson_at_nospam>
Date: Thu May 21 2009 - 15:51:53 GMT
To: "" <>


So when you say two full duplex span ports, does that mean two full duplex SOURCE ports, and is that two per switch, or per span group?

I have 4 ports that I want to mirror to one port that snort watches-currently that only one of those ports is setup as full duplex, the others are received traffic only. The total aggregated bandwidth is less than 1GB for the four ports.

Depending on whether the 6500 can actually support more than 2 full duplex span ports per switch will change what I'll need in the way of network taps/port aggregator devices, I think.

From: David Thomason [] Sent: May 20, 2009 5:51 PM
To: Jefferson, Shawn
Cc: David Thomason
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] SPAN groups and network taps


I'm not an expert when it comes to Cisco, but I do know that the 6500 can support two full duplex span ports. As far as limitations, that really depends on how much traffic you are sending to SPAN port. It is possible to overflow a 1G Span port with more than 1G of data. In this case the switch starts dropping packets to the Span port. The span port gets the lowest priority of service, but overflowing the SPAN port can impact performance on the entire switch.

Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship.

Snort-users mailing list
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: Snort-users list archive: