snort-users: Re: [Snort-users] Another early morning fatal warni
Re: [Snort-users] Another early morning fatal warning
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Matt Olney <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Damn Mondays:
> "Yes, the published rules are >>NOW<< 2.8.4. specific."
Is it just me, or should 2.8.4 have been 2.9 instead?
Why does a sub-minor version (major.minor.sub-minor) contain so much
new functionality (specifically thinking SMB here)?
I know -- it's free; if you don't like it, tough, etc. :)
Still, moving to 2.9 would have made it clearer to users and saved
some support time, I think.
Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations
Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of
expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry
leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf
and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
Snort-users mailing list
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
Snort-users list archive: