snort-sigs February 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > snort-sigs archives
snort-sigs: Re: [Snort-sigs] oinkmaster and so rules.. FAQ broke

Re: [Snort-sigs] oinkmaster and so rules.. FAQ broken?

From: Randal T. Rioux <randy_at_nospam>
Date: Wed Feb 09 2011 - 01:23:29 GMT

On 2/8/2011 8:20 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 2/8/2011 19:52, Joel Esler wrote:
>> Have you tried pulledpork? It takes care of all this for you (plus much more)
> how'd i know that was coming?? :? ;)

That train is never late!


-- Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am, by definition, "the intended recipient" 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit 3. I will take the contents as representing the views of your company 4. If your email is an "Out of Office" reply on a mailing list, I will social engineer your company 5. This notification overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message Further, you understand that if any of the following conditions are met that you are indeed, a bag of douche: 1. Your message identifies the device you sent it from 2. You messed up the thread by top-posting ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list