|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > selinux archives|
On Friday, May 31, 2013 05:31:08 PM David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <email@example.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:36:18 -0400
> > Take #3 ... two changes here: the first is a simple reordering of the
> > two patches and the second is stripping the SELinux patch (2/2 in this
> > patchset) of everything but the bare bones changes needed to fix the
> > problem in the 3.10-rcX tree.
> Series applied, but longer term I'd like to see this handled by generation
> counts or similar during lookup time.
> Doing a GC every policy delete hurts policy delete performance, something
> we worked really hard to make as light weight as possible given the
Thanks for pulling in the fixes for 3.10-rcX.
I promise to take a look at changing our approach to detecting an active
labeled IPsec configuration for future releases. I need to cleanup our
labeled IPsec code anyway, it is in need of some TLC (you saw some of the
changes in the earlier version of this patchset).
-- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.