|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > samba-users archives|
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:43 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 03:14:53PM +0200, Francois Lepretre wrote:
> > Le 26/08/2010 19:40, Jeremy Allison a √©crit :
> > >>OK. I have also tried 3.6-pre1 and git version. Same result : Win7
> > >>clients can not connect to a guest ok share.
> > >>Should I file a bug on this ?
> > >
> > >Yes please, and attach a debug level 10 log. Are you
> > >testing v3-6-test git tree ? I fixed a bug in that area
> > >post 3.6-pre1 related to guest access.
> > Yes, smbd version shows '3.6.0pre1-GIT-f87ecd7-test' so I think/hope
> > I am testing v3-6-test tree :-)
> > I have opened bugid 7653 and attached log files of a test case
> > ( https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7653 )
> > Thanks a lot for your help.
> Oh, you're using "security = share". How I *hate*
> that setting :-). You do realize "security = user"
> can do everything that "security = share" can do,
> don't you ? I'm pretty sure SMB2 guest connections
> work with "security = user" (as that's how I test them :-).
If we can vote on this I would vote to *never* support security = share
on smb2. I don't think there is any native smb2 client that would really
expect it or work with it anyway.
-- Simo Sorce Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <email@example.com> Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba