|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > oss-security archives|
CVE-2010-3073 encfs Only 32 bit of file IV used
CVE-2010-3074 encfs Watermarking attack
CVE-2010-3075 encfs Last block with single byte is insecure"
-- JB ----- "Jan Lieskovsky" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Hello Steve, vendors, > > Micha Riser reported: > [A] > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-08/0316.html > > three security flaws in EncFS encrypted filesystem (more from [A]): > > "A security analysis of EncFS has revealed multiple vulnerabilities: > (1) Only 32 bit of file IV used > (2) Watermarking attack > (3) Last block with single byte is insecure" > > References: > [B] http://www.arg0.net/encfs > [C] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335938 > [D] > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-08/att-0316/watermark-attack-encfs.tar.gz > [E] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630460 > > > Solutions / patches information: > ================================ > > * for issue (1) -- seems it wasn't fixed / isn't possible to > fix without breaking backward compatibility. More from [B]: > > "The old IV setup is kept for backwards compatibility." > > * for issue (2) -- EncFS upstream has released a fix for the issue: > [F] http://code.google.com/p/encfs/source/detail?r=59 > > Valient, could you please confirm, the above referenced [F] patch, > is the correct one to address the watermarking attack issue? > > * for issue (3) -- not sure about patch status (included in [F] too?) > > Steve, could you allocate CVE ids for these flaws? > > Thanks && Regards, Jan. > -- > Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team