Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> The attached patch (171282b3553fcec43b9ab615eb7daf6c2b494a87) applies
> against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1. It addresses the problem reported by Kevin and
> Andy - ultimately, the legacy support wasn't transparent. In particular,
> userspace 32-bit capability manipulations (when run by root) that used
> to work, without this patch, fail.
>

This works for me. I guess the appropriate line is:

Tested-by: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>

• -- Kevin Winchester -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHQHkqKPGFQbiQ3tQRAt/uAJ9bWz4XHFDkavlCsl4wyT91KXa5GQCfZ3t1 4fy44s2RVnNDQaVJasf4OF0=
=QMO4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Rob Meijer: "Re: [Apparmor-dev] Object Capabilities for AppArmor"
• Previous message: Andrew Morgan: "[PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)"
• In reply to: Andrew Morgan: "[PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)"
• Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: [PATCH] 64bit capability support (legacy support fix)"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]