linux-kernel May 2008 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > linux-kernel archives
linux-kernel: By Thread

linux-kernel By Thread

SubjectAuthor Date
[PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeAhmed S. Darwish30 May 2008
[PATCH BUGFIX -v2 -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeAhmed S. Darwish30 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -v2 -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeTetsuo Handa30 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -v2 -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeAndrew Morton30 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -v2 -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeAhmed S. Darwish31 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -v2 -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeCasey Schaufler30 May 2008
Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeCasey Schaufler30 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeAhmed S. Darwish31 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modeCasey Schaufler31 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel modePaul Moore31 May 2008
[patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security opsMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 04/15] security: pass path to inode_rmdirMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 06/15] security: pass path to inode_symlinkMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 07/15] security: pass path to inode_linkMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 08/15] security: pass path to inode_renameMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 05/15] security: pass path to inode_unlinkMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 10/15] security: pass path to inode_getxattrMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 02/15] security: pass path to inode_mknodMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 15/15] security: pass path to inode_permissionMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 09/15] security: pass path to inode_setattrMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_createMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
--> Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_createChristoph Hellwig31 May 2008
--> Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_createTetsuo Handa31 May 2008
[patch 11/15] security: pass path to inode_listxattrMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 03/15] security: pass path to inode_mkdirMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 13/15] security: pass path to inode_removexattrMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 14/15] vfs: more path_permission() conversionsMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
[patch 12/15] security: pass path to inode_setxattrMiklos Szeredi29 May 2008
Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security opsTetsuo Handa30 May 2008
--> Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security opsMiklos Szeredi30 May 2008
--> Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security opsTetsuo Handa31 May 2008
Re: Bug/misfeature of "securityfs"James Morris27 May 2008
Re: Bug/misfeature of "securityfs"Greg KH27 May 2008
--> Re: Bug/misfeature of "securityfs"Markku Savela27 May 2008
--> Re: Bug/misfeature of "securityfs"Markku Savela27 May 2008
Re: capget() overflows buffers.Andrew G. Morgan23 May 2008
Re: capget() overflows buffers.Chris Wright23 May 2008
--> Re: capget() overflows buffers.Andrew G. Morgan24 May 2008
--> Re: capget() overflows buffers.Chris Wright24 May 2008
--> [PATCH] security: was "Re: capget() overflows buffers."Andrew G. Morgan27 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] security: was "Re: capget() overflows buffers."Chris Wright27 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] security: was "Re: capget() overflows buffers."Andrew Morton28 May 2008
Re: capget() overflows buffers.Chris Wright23 May 2008
--> Re: capget() overflows buffers.Andrew G. Morgan24 May 2008
--> Re: capget() overflows buffers.Chris Wright24 May 2008
--> Re: capget() overflows buffers.Andrew G. Morgan24 May 2008
--> Re: capget() overflows buffers.Chris Wright24 May 2008
[PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueShi Weihua22 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueAndrew Morton22 May 2008
--> Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueLi Zefan22 May 2008
--> Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueAndrew Morton22 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueAndrew G. Morgan22 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueAndrew Morton22 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueAndrew Morton22 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueAndrew G. Morgan22 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueSerge E. Hallyn22 May 2008
[PATCH] security: protect legacy apps from insufficient privilegeAndrew G. Morgan21 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] security: protect legacy apps from insufficient privilegeSerge E. Hallyn21 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] security: protect legacy apps from insufficient privilegeAndrew G. Morgan22 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] security: protect legacy apps from insufficient privilegeAndrew Morton22 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] security: protect legacy apps from insufficient privilegeAndrew G. Morgan22 May 2008
[PATCH] capabilities: fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueShi Weihua21 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueSerge E. Hallyn21 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] capabilities: fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized valueShi Weihua22 May 2008
LSM: MAINTAINERS points to no longer existing URLAdrian Bunk19 May 2008
Re: LSM: MAINTAINERS points to no longer existing URLChris Wright19 May 2008
--> Re: LSM: MAINTAINERS points to no longer existing URLStephen Smalley20 May 2008
--> Re: LSM: MAINTAINERS points to no longer existing URLChris Wright20 May 2008
[PATCH] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachStephen Smalley19 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachChris Wright19 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachJames Morris20 May 2008
[RFC][PATCH v2] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachStephen Smalley15 May 2008
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachCasey Schaufler15 May 2008
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachSerge E. Hallyn15 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] security: split proc ptrace checking into read vs. attachStephen Smalley15 May 2008
Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)Alexey Dobriyan13 May 2008
Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)KaiGai Kohei14 May 2008
Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)KaiGai Kohei14 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)Chris Wright14 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)KaiGai Kohei14 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)Andrew Morgan15 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)KaiGai Kohei15 May 2008
[RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procStephen Smalley12 May 2008
Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procCasey Schaufler12 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procStephen Smalley13 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procChris Wright14 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procStephen Smalley14 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procChris Wright14 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procStephen Smalley14 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procChris Wright14 May 2008
--> Re: [RFC][PATCH] security: split ptrace checking in procStephen Smalley12 May 2008
[PATCH] capabilities: add bounding set to /proc/self/statusSerge E. Hallyn01 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add bounding set to /proc/self/statusAndrew G. Morgan02 May 2008
Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add bounding set to /proc/self/statusChris Wright02 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add bounding set to /proc/self/statusMichael Kerrisk05 May 2008
--> Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add bounding set to /proc/self/statusAndrew Morton05 May 2008
Re: [TOMOYO #8 (2.6.25-mm1) 1/7] Introduce new LSM hooks.Tetsuo Handa01 May 2008
Re: [TOMOYO #8 (2.6.25-mm1) 1/7] Introduce new LSM hooks.Stephen Smalley01 May 2008
Re: [TOMOYO #8 (2.6.25-mm1) 1/7] Introduce new LSM hooks.Chris Wright01 May 2008
--> Re: [TOMOYO #8 (2.6.25-mm1) 1/7] Introduce new LSM hooks.Stephen Smalley01 May 2008
Re: [TOMOYO #8 (2.6.25-mm1) 1/7] Introduce new LSM hooks.Tetsuo Handa07 May 2008