|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > ipsec archives|
I completely agree that we shouldn't be duplicating the NEA protocols. OTOH, I'm willing to consider transport of NEA information within IKE/IPsec if people are interested. Note that NEA has just only started to look at their own mainstream transport protocol (NEA-PT). This is very likely to end up being EAP.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
> Stephen Kent
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 10:48
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-wong-ipsecme-ikev2-integrity-data-00.txt
> At 4:06 PM -0400 9/11/09, Marcus Wong wrote:
> >Steve, you are mostly right, but this I-D only deals with the integrity
> >exchange using the notify payload. Thanks.
> Thanks for the clarification. That still raises the question of why
> we ought to duplicate this NEA functionality in IKE. Does the I-D
> provide suitable motivation for that, and has the idea been passed by
> the NEA WG folks?
> IPsec mailing list
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.