|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
That's the way!!!! The government must have a kind of protocol to allow OS
to be released.
I believe that Windows will no longer exist after that. LOL.
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:03:03 -0200, Rafael Moraes said:
> > This is a subject that need to be discussed very carefully. I agree, It
> > should be "controlled", but, how far?
> In particular, one must be *very* careful to not create unintended
> consequences. For instance, in general the more regulated an industry is,
> more risk-adverse the companies get - both because regulation implies
> rock the boat" and the second-order effects of compliance paperwork and
> issues. Look at the mountains of paperwork needed to get the FAA to
> type-certify a new airplane as airworthy - what if Microsoft had to do that
> level of detail for Windows 8, the next release of Exchange, and the next
> release of Office?
> How do you make Microsoft "regulated" in any meaningful sense, and still
> them the ability to ship an out-of-cycle patch?
-- Att, Rafael Moraes Linux Professional Institute Certified - Level 1 ITIL Foundations Certified
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/