full-disclosure-uk January 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > full-disclosure-uk archives
full-disclosure-uk: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alte

Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

From: Rohit Patnaik <quanticle_at_nospam>
Date: Tue Jan 26 2010 - 04:16:09 GMT
To: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@gmail.com>


It depends entirely on how you define "flawed". As I stated earlier, the goal of the prosecutor is not some abstract ideal of justice. It is a conviction. Anything they can do within the law to convict you is fair game. Using statements that you put on your hard drive certainly falls under those rules, regardless of what the original intent was.

  • Rohit Patnaik

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@gmail.com>wrote:

> So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from
> day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT
> NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........?
> oops.................
>



Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/