full-disclosure-uk January 2009 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > full-disclosure-uk archives
full-disclosure-uk: Re: [Full-disclosure] Postings

Re: [Full-disclosure] Postings

From: n3td3v <xploitable_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 18:17:38 GMT
To: Ureleet <ureleet@gmail.com>, full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk


There has been no darkmyst on full-disclosure, you've just slipped up and closed the gap on who you actually are.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@gmail.com> wrote:
> o, and dont forget darkmyst.
>
> u liar.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> i wrote an email last week that said i will lay off of andrew. i did.
>>> and it seems like the list has torn him apart without me. further
>>> echoing the sentiment that i share.
>>>
>>
>> Your nicknames
>>
>>> andrew is, in fact, a worthless air sucker..
>>>
>>> now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
>>> spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
>>>
>>> heres my request:
>>>
>>> no 1 respond 2 n3td3v. not now, not ever. ive done my deed in
>>> further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least
>>> 20-30 others have done so as well.
>>>
>>
>> Your nicknames
>>
>>> i saw that andrew posted that he was applying 4 mi5. good luck. btw
>>> -- when mi5 reviews applications, (of dropouts especially), they tend
>>> 2 do a little research. 1 of those steps is to google ur name.
>>>
>>> andrew wallace
>>>
>>
>> They know me already
>>
>>> and they will then realize that andrew wallace, is indeed n3td3v. and
>>> u then will not have a job. u will fail.
>>>
>>
>> Unlikely if I have intelligence they want
>>
>>> i also noticed that andrew/n3td3v said that he was leaving the list.
>>> again. ...again... but we all know, hell be back in a week or so, if
>>> not already.
>>>
>>
>> Still here
>>
>>> i ask that u all ignore him. no 1 respond 2 him. i wont, j-f, i hope
>>> u dont, biz marquee, i hope u dont. every1, i implore u 2 please
>>> ignore him. especially those, like j-f said, who feel that they have
>>> 2 point out (like me) what a tool he is because if we dont, then that
>>> means we accept it. which is wrong.
>>>
>>
>> Take your own advice
>>
>>> andrew i leave u w/ this thought:
>>>
>>> i speak for @ least 30 ppl on this list. not every1, (as u
>>> undoubtably will point out, like u do in every other fucking thread),
>>> and especially all ur aliases such as sexybitch169 or whatever ur name
>>> is. we dont like u. we think u have no value. we think that the
>>> best thing u can do 4 the community is to leave. we do not value ur
>>> opinion. in case u havent noticed, the security community pretty much
>>> doesnt value any1s opinion! thats it.
>>>
>>
>> Your nicknames
>>
>> Mine have only ever been:
>>
>> n3td3v
>> xploitable
>> hackthegov
>> worriedsecurity
>>
>>> u want 2 b legit? try learning, and not regurgitating. u post
>>> nothing of value. we read the same stuff u do. and those of us that
>>> havent read it by the time u do, need to step up their game because
>>> they r falling woefully behind.
>>>
>>
>> More garbage
>>
>>> c u in 10 years if u listen 2 me. see u in 3-5 days if u dont.
>>>
>>
>> Hope not
>>
>



Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/