full-disclosure-uk January 2009 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > full-disclosure-uk archives
full-disclosure-uk: Re: [Full-disclosure] Postings

Re: [Full-disclosure] Postings

From: Ureleet <ureleet_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 18:12:32 GMT
To: n3td3v <xploitable@gmail.com>


no, they are not my nicknames u tard. u r the only 1 that has like 4 nicks.

i hate you. i hope you die. fuck. you.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> i wrote an email last week that said i will lay off of andrew. i did.
>> and it seems like the list has torn him apart without me. further
>> echoing the sentiment that i share.
>>
>
> Your nicknames
>
>> andrew is, in fact, a worthless air sucker..
>>
>> now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
>> spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
>>
>> heres my request:
>>
>> no 1 respond 2 n3td3v. not now, not ever. ive done my deed in
>> further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least
>> 20-30 others have done so as well.
>>
>
> Your nicknames
>
>> i saw that andrew posted that he was applying 4 mi5. good luck. btw
>> -- when mi5 reviews applications, (of dropouts especially), they tend
>> 2 do a little research. 1 of those steps is to google ur name.
>>
>> andrew wallace
>>
>
> They know me already
>
>> and they will then realize that andrew wallace, is indeed n3td3v. and
>> u then will not have a job. u will fail.
>>
>
> Unlikely if I have intelligence they want
>
>> i also noticed that andrew/n3td3v said that he was leaving the list.
>> again. ...again... but we all know, hell be back in a week or so, if
>> not already.
>>
>
> Still here
>
>> i ask that u all ignore him. no 1 respond 2 him. i wont, j-f, i hope
>> u dont, biz marquee, i hope u dont. every1, i implore u 2 please
>> ignore him. especially those, like j-f said, who feel that they have
>> 2 point out (like me) what a tool he is because if we dont, then that
>> means we accept it. which is wrong.
>>
>
> Take your own advice
>
>> andrew i leave u w/ this thought:
>>
>> i speak for @ least 30 ppl on this list. not every1, (as u
>> undoubtably will point out, like u do in every other fucking thread),
>> and especially all ur aliases such as sexybitch169 or whatever ur name
>> is. we dont like u. we think u have no value. we think that the
>> best thing u can do 4 the community is to leave. we do not value ur
>> opinion. in case u havent noticed, the security community pretty much
>> doesnt value any1s opinion! thats it.
>>
>
> Your nicknames
>
> Mine have only ever been:
>
> n3td3v
> xploitable
> hackthegov
> worriedsecurity
>
>> u want 2 b legit? try learning, and not regurgitating. u post
>> nothing of value. we read the same stuff u do. and those of us that
>> havent read it by the time u do, need to step up their game because
>> they r falling woefully behind.
>>
>
> More garbage
>
>> c u in 10 years if u listen 2 me. see u in 3-5 days if u dont.
>>
>
> Hope not
>



Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/