full-disclosure-uk January 2009 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > full-disclosure-uk archives
full-disclosure-uk: Re: [Full-disclosure] Postings

Re: [Full-disclosure] Postings

From: n3td3v <xploitable_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 15:36:27 GMT
To: Ureleet <ureleet@gmail.com>, full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@gmail.com> wrote:
> i wrote an email last week that said i will lay off of andrew. i did.
> and it seems like the list has torn him apart without me. further
> echoing the sentiment that i share.

Your nicknames

> andrew is, in fact, a worthless air sucker..
> now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
> spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
> heres my request:
> no 1 respond 2 n3td3v. not now, not ever. ive done my deed in
> further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least
> 20-30 others have done so as well.

Your nicknames

> i saw that andrew posted that he was applying 4 mi5. good luck. btw
> -- when mi5 reviews applications, (of dropouts especially), they tend
> 2 do a little research. 1 of those steps is to google ur name.
> andrew wallace

They know me already

> and they will then realize that andrew wallace, is indeed n3td3v. and
> u then will not have a job. u will fail.

Unlikely if I have intelligence they want

> i also noticed that andrew/n3td3v said that he was leaving the list.
> again. ...again... but we all know, hell be back in a week or so, if
> not already.

Still here

> i ask that u all ignore him. no 1 respond 2 him. i wont, j-f, i hope
> u dont, biz marquee, i hope u dont. every1, i implore u 2 please
> ignore him. especially those, like j-f said, who feel that they have
> 2 point out (like me) what a tool he is because if we dont, then that
> means we accept it. which is wrong.

Take your own advice

> andrew i leave u w/ this thought:
> i speak for @ least 30 ppl on this list. not every1, (as u
> undoubtably will point out, like u do in every other fucking thread),
> and especially all ur aliases such as sexybitch169 or whatever ur name
> is. we dont like u. we think u have no value. we think that the
> best thing u can do 4 the community is to leave. we do not value ur
> opinion. in case u havent noticed, the security community pretty much
> doesnt value any1s opinion! thats it.

Your nicknames

Mine have only ever been:


> u want 2 b legit? try learning, and not regurgitating. u post
> nothing of value. we read the same stuff u do. and those of us that
> havent read it by the time u do, need to step up their game because
> they r falling woefully behind.

More garbage

> c u in 10 years if u listen 2 me. see u in 3-5 days if u dont.

Hope not

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/