|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
Well, that's exactly what I'm saying. Pretending that this is some kind new exploit class simply because Google Wave is used is stupid. This is the logical extension of e-mail and instant message and social network attacks to the next potential platform.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:10 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:01:36 CST, Rohit Patnaik said:
> > Yeah, no kidding. Surprise! Untrusted files can be malicious. If you
> > accept files from those whom you do not trust, whether its via e-mail,
> > instant message, Google Wave, or physical media, you well and truly
> > the virus that'll eventually infect your machine.
> Let's see.. *HOW* many years ago did we first see e-mail based viruses that
> depended on people opening them because they came from people they already
> knew? 'CHRISTMA EXEC' in 1984 comes to mind.
> The problem here is that Google Wave is for *collaboration* - which means
> that you're communicating with people you already know, and presumably
> trust to some degree or other. "Hey Joe, look at this PDF and tell me
> what you think" is something reasonable when the request comes from
> who Joe knows and who has sent Joe PDF's in the past.
> I guarantee that if every time you receive a document that appears to be
> your boss, you call back and ask if they really intended to send a document
> if it's a virus, your boss will get very cranky with you very fast.
> Let's look at that original advisory again:
> >> An attacker could upload his malware to a wave and share it to his
> >> Google Wave contacts.
> Now change that to "An attacker could trick/pwn some poor victim into
> the malware to a wave...." Hilarity ensues.