|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:54 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:09:58 GMT, you said:
>> I'm not a troll and only serious researchers are subscribed to the
>> n3td3v mailing list group.
> What does the following read like? A serious researcher? Or a troll/idiot?
You're doing yourself no good Valdis calling me an idiot you will only lose your own resolve.
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:40:54 +0000
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Vord from the in-famous script kiddie channel #hackphreak!! omg, thats
> the biggest no credibility lamer channel ever.
> Its channels like #hackphreak which give IRC a bad name, the exact
> reason this thread started probably!!
> Vord, go back to #hackphreak kiddo.
> Oh, and if you can't remember, it was From: n3td3v <email@example.com>
There is nothing there that anyone with a clue would disagree with.
>> I have and I see me saying things that people thought I was saying to
>> get a reaction when they are actually real things that are going on
>> and my actual opinion on things.
> Unfortunately for your reputation, that's quite close to "No, I'm not a troll,
> I really had such stupid opinions on things".
> >From there, it's just a short jump to "He's consistently clueless on *this*
> list - if he actually *has* 4500 people on another list, he's either equally
> clueless there and people read it for the humor value, or he's actually
> intelligent there - in which case he's a troll playing an idiot here".
I'm not clueless on this list everything I say is pretty accurate.