|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
That's my whole point.
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 13:35 -0400, Dave wrote:
> Wouldn't their press release indicate that they are actually keeping the
> unit intact? After all, it IS the Office of Disinformation.
> William McAfee wrote:
> > I have to say, the DoD would be crazy not to ramp up AFCYBER. What
> > reason on or off Earth do they have to intentionally not protect
> > themselves against attack on the network front? It's crazy to leave
> > yourself vulnerable like that, much less not have a method of offensive
> > strike. It's like a country just now deciding to have an Air Force and
> > then out of the blue saying 'Nope, sorry, nevermind.'
> > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:39 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> >> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:43:11 EDT, Peter Dawson said:
> >>> seems the cybercommand is not ramping up..
> >> A few years ago, the US Dept of Defense admitted that they had an Office
> >> of Disinformation dedicated to feeding bogus info to our enemies. Of course,
> >> there was a public outrage for some reason. The only official announcement
> >> that the Office ever released was a press release that they were disbanding
> >> due to the public outrage...
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/