|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
seems the cybercommand is not ramping up..
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:02 AM, <email@example.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> There's no need as n3td3v got see-throught powa + thight pants
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:23:36 +0200 William McAfee <sec-
> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >Would you mind elaborating on your actual evidence? All I see is
> >but I do not see much hard fact. I'm not agreeing, I'm not
> >I'm just asking for clarification.
> >On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 01:08 +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> >> By the way, Russian sites have been hacked as well. So why is
> >> only talking about the Georgian sites and infrastructure? If
> >> sites and infrastructure is down as well that means the Georgian
> >> government has hacked them, doesn't it Or does it? Or is the
> >> thing just a false flag by the U.S government underworld to
> >> McCain and Obama as they are potentially coming in to the white
> >> It seems to me that there is bias towards Russia in the security
> >> community and that people don't really care if Russia was
> >> because the community seem to have already chosen who they like
> >> who they are going to support and who they are going to point
> >> at.
> >> I don't think westerners have ever liked Russia, so as soon as
> >> something like this happens, folks straight away are bias
> >> Russia.
> >> You've got to remember this could easily be a false flag cyber
> >> to setup Russia to make them look bad while ramping up cyber
> >> as a national security agenda as Marcus Sachs
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU says in the Youtube
> >> The reasons for a false flag cyber attack is there, the evidence
> >> been put in front of you by n3td3v.
> >> This isn't just some false flag conspiracy, there are plausible
> >> reasons why this could be a false flag.
> >> In the video Marcus Sachs asked the audience for ways we could
> >> cyber security a national security agenda, false flagging
> >> like the Georgian and Russian websites and infrastructure is not
> >a way
> >> the government underworld might make cyber security a national
> >> security agenda?
> >> I call a false flag, and I find it suspicious that people are
> >> talking about the Georgian websites and infrastructure being
> >> attacked and not the Russian stuff as well.
> >> I would be interested in what answers the audience gave to
> >> Sachs, but thats not in the video unfortunately.
> >> All the best,
> >> n3td3v
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Charset: UTF8
> Version: Hush 3.0
> Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Don't leave everything up in the air. Click here for great quotes on flight
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/