|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
My question was mostly rhetoric, I tried to imply the point on why computers with sensitive information were; 1. not fully up to date (=>from the top of my had, the exploit had several issues in non-standard browser versions?) 2. running internet explorer (=>more known as a target, nothing against MSIE) 3. used to surf the web (=>why else would you be using IE [rhetoric]) 4. not monitored correctly (=>our most sensitive information is stored in a server locked up 5 times, the only way to get in is either getting all the keys or through a remote exploit*)
I think the above points violate a couple of rules in security auditing.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Peter Besenbruch <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 January 2010 21:49:05 Christian Sciberras wrote:
>> "They used an IE exploit to get in."
>> The people at *Google* use *IE*?!! Besides, how does an exploit in IE
>> affect the server?
> It would affect a person with login rights to a server.
> This wasn't just an attack on Google, btw, it was an attack on 32 different
> Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
> HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/