full-disclosure-uk January 2009 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > full-disclosure-uk archives
full-disclosure-uk: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure wouldn

Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure wouldn't let me post this message

From: Ureleet <ureleet_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Jan 08 2009 - 15:06:53 GMT
To: n3td3v <xploitable@gmail.com>


o i c. were dumb and ur smart..

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:12 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jan G.B. <ro0ot.w00t@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think that your post is on topic of this list. And I don't
>> think anyone is following you - guess that's the reason why you're
>> *here*, again.
>> Also, an intellectual reply to your posting would be quite absurd.
>>
>
> I see "cyber war" being used incorrectly a national security issue.
>
> You may not realise that it might be, but I see it as being one.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/