|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
On 8-Aug-08, at 10:11 AM, Ben Laurie wrote: >
> It also only fixes this single type of key compromise. Surely it is
> time to stop ignoring CRLs before something more serious goes wrong?
Clearly many implementors have chosen to *knowingly* ignore CRLs despite the security implications, so my take away would be that the current public key infrastructure is flawed.