|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > full-disclosure-uk archives|
I played with it a little yesterday and posted my thoughts (as well as a summary of their whole scan) at:
It is a nice tool with some good checks looking for SQL, XSS, etc... I
just think they
didn't look deep enough in my site to check more stuff...
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Robin Sage <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> If anyone has any more invite codes please send one to me.
> I tried the ones posted and they were not functional.
> I also emailed support and never received a response.
> Has anyone compared this to AppScan, WebInspect, Sentinnel, Qualys or
> Acunetix ?
> How many trials do you get per invite code? Just 1 app?
> From: Jardel Weyrich <email@example.com>
> To: p8x <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: email@example.com
> Sent: Thu, January 7, 2010 9:33:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] iiscan results
> It's probably trying to get different results/responses by changing
> the values of some request headers. The most common scenario, as far
> as I've seen, and as oddly as it might sound, is the User-Agent and
> HTTP minor version.
> A more verbose logging strategy would demystify. Or maybe Vincent?